Testing the limits of AI deep research

FAIL stamp
The experiment

I used Abacus AI's Deep Agent to conduct research on what I thought was an unsolvable problem: finding small family foundations willing to support grassroots voter turnout efforts. And you know what? I was right. It is an unsolvable problem.

My starting assumption was that small family foundations would be a good fit for us as a small, all-volunteer organization: smaller grants, fewer reporting requirements, more flexibility. Although the organization supports voter turnout across the country, we thought family foundations might support efforts in their states / communities.

The mistake

I hoped that AI could wade through mountains of 990s and annual reports to find a donor providing just what we needed. But like any experiment — you can't think your way out of a faulty hypothesis. I was too focused on what we needed, and not focused enough on what these kinds of donors are willing to fund.


What I should have known
  • Philanthropy is based on relationships — prospecting donors is just not strictly an information problem, and not well suited for AI research.
  • Funding for voting issues is almost entirely funded through large national organizations and networks.
  • Family foundations are locally focused, and not interested in geographically diverse organizations.
Next time

I will spend more time on the front end, stress testing my assumptions before dedicating effort to deep research. Trawling 990s for median grant sizes or clusters of foundations funding the same recipients would be much more suited to AI research.